As was noticed at Winter of Dissent, there's a bit of growing problem here in Bozeman, America. The white supremacists have settled in for a long winter's nap. So, I'll answer the call to arms, and at least recount the recent events. A warning, though; some of the links in this post will be to the websites of the white supremacist organizations mentioned. If you find me repugnant for sending them traffic, then I would like to point out that throwing a curtain over the ugliness, doesn't make it go away, as I will point out again later in this piece.
Earlier this year, members of the National Alliance distributed flyers around Bozeman and Great Falls that pronounced "Missing ...A Future For White Children". The flyers gave a quick view into the groups beliefs and a membership form. Later, around Thanksgiving, another distribution of flyers was perpetrated in the Bozeman areas (Bozeman, Belgrade and Manhattan), as well as other places in Montana. I write perpetrated, because this was a stealth effort. Flyers were left on doorsteps in the night, weighted with rocks and baggies of sand. This time, there was a reaction from the communities.
On December 14th, the Gallatin Valley Human Rights Task Force appeared before the Bozeman City Commission, asking them to condemn the flyer drops. Make no mistake, that Comical article is dreadful, with several incorrect attributions and facts. For instance, the man who was threatened by the Mayor with forcible ejection for disrupting the proceedings was not attempting to shout down the woman speaking. He was yelling at the mayor to pay attention to the speaker. Yup, quality mayor we got here, but that's a post for another time. Also, the local representative of the National Alliance who addressed the commission is not "Kevin McGuyer", but Kevin McGuire. And apparently, he wasn't very impressed with the accuracy of the Chronicle's writing either.
To bring this story up to the now, the City Commission met last night, with this community condemnation of racist flyering on the agenda. However, it appears that taxes took center stage, and if anything proceeded on this issue, the local paper isn't reporting it.
So, besides completely up in the air, where does that leave things? Very good question. Within the white supremacist community, Mr. McGuire is something of a hero. The National Vanguard, news magazine for the "white rule" folk, has this write up by Kevin himself. Due to the efforts of Kevin and his compatriots, it seems that the white supremacist movement has taken quite the interest in Montana, and Bozeman especially. Yes, I know that these folks have always taken an interest in this state, but I think we sometimes need a wake up call as to how deeply committed to fostering their agenda here that these folks really are. According to McGuire, there are at least 25 members of the National Alliance, right here in Bozeman. But they do have a strong communication network, and the efforts of the Bozeman group are being applauded on the forums of Stormfront.Org. Rather than shy away from those forum responses, I urge you to read them. They offer an intriguing view into the minds of the these people, and even offer a few gems of wisdom:
Actually it is the very best strategy for us. What the ADL, politicians, and various Human Rights Task Force groups fail to understand is publicly condemning our views by holding meetings, and passing resolutions of no substance and no authority simply formalize us as a potential mighty force in the mind of the masses.
The ADL tried the same game here and once it hit the news I had almost more positive contacts and potential recruits then I knew how to deal with.
Kevin called their bluff, made them look like fools, and will no doubt have increased any effort he made previously 10 times fold.
This is why I feel it inappropriate to hide these folks under a blanket. They believe in what they're doing, they aren't going away and there are those who haven't spoken up who agree with them. Furthermore, we damage our own position of righteousness when we attempt to silence or condemn them.
These organizations feed and grow off of victimization, and reactionary steps only feed that, especially if we get silly about the reaction. Look at this quote from the BC article:
"I'm very pleased that he showed up because I think it makes it very clear that the organization has moved to Bozeman and wants to stay here," Stacey Haugland said.
And the best strategy from keeping it from establishing a presence in the city is to condemn it while it's sill trying to get a foothold, she said.
Stacy, what part of "they're here" don't you understand? They have a presence, and condemning that simply justifies it. They're not trying to get a foothold; they have one or this wouldn't be happening. The trick now, is to deal with them. When I was much younger, I took a spontaneous trip through Clark Fork, Idaho. There was a sign at the edge of town that read "Welcome to Clark Fork. Nigger go Home." If we erect a sign at the edge of Bozeman that says "National Alliance Go Home", we've simply justified the very feelings of need that these people think they can assuage. Nope, they're a part of the community, albeit a very small and annoying part. Official condemnations won't work, threats of violence won't work, and telling them that they smell and we don't want them in OUR place simply ... won't ... work.
As with many things, I think the only missing element is a bit of education. These people aren't Dangerous because they spew "hate speech". They're dangerous because they believe a war is coming, between whites and those of muddy background, and they will do what it takes to win. Don't feed the maw of opposition and you starve the idea of war. The Anti-Defamation League and Southern Poverty Law Center figured this out quite some time ago, and have actively pursued removing these peoples resources with which a war can be waged. It does no good to wave your finger and tell them "you ... you ... you're bad you ... person!!1!". Remove their resources. Let them put flyers on every signpost in this town. Good for Kinko's, bad for their pocketbooks. Let them rant and rail at any city commission meeting they choose ... as long as any prospective recruit understands that they are called on to die for the cause (hint ... they won't get many). Read the Turner Diaries (written by the founder of the National Alliance). Know what you're up against before you arrogantly assume that a small city commission in a small western town, in a small population western state will deal these folks a death blow with a pronouncement of "bad racist ... bad".
I read the Turner Diaries while I was married to my second wife. I discussed the book briefly with my ex-father-in-law. It scared me, and it scared him, for the exact opposite reasons. It scared him because he really believes that the Jewish controlled Clintonistas are going to send the Black apemen battalions to collect his guns in the middle of a dark and stormy night, and that FEMA will try and ship him to a camp in North Dakota. It scared me because there are people who actually buy into this line of completely impossible bullshit. Needless to say, our discussion about the book didn't last long. But I took away the lasting truth that there are people who are irrationally sympathetic to the victimization complex of the white supremacists. Don't aid and abet the enemy by proving them right on the least significant point they can muster.
In one of my favorite movies, Yul Brenner as Pharaoh Ramses says of his opponent Moses, "Let him rave that men shall know him mad". Okay, so, Moses had God on his side, but these folks don't. To that quote I say "So let it be written; So let it be done".
Good for you. Thanks for the update.
Do you remember what they did in Billings years ago, with everyone putting menorahs in their windows to protest a hate crime against Jews? It was very moving ... and effective. There was a documentary movie made about it.
I'd like to add that the Montana Human Rights Network is a good source of information. http://www.mhrn.org/ The website sucks, but they publish a good newsletter, which is on the site in PDF.
Posted by: Patia | December 21, 2004 at 05:45 PM
These folks have addresses, yes? I think a grassroots mailing campaign to their block, featuring quotes from their buddies, would help the cause.
If you're fighting for white justice, and all of your white neighbors hate you, it's much harder to organize a cross burning.
Letting them know that white people hate them is the key.
Posted by: Jon | December 22, 2004 at 10:02 AM
Wulfgar; thanks for the update. I had heard about the problems in Bozeman, but not the Great Falls flyers. IMO, the only way to deal with these racists is to expose what they are doing and saying to as many people as possible.
Aaron Weissman, President
Montana Association of Jewish Communities
Posted by: Aaron Weissman | December 23, 2004 at 02:11 PM
Both my parents survived the Holocaust. As a community let us not allow hate to take hold once again.
Posted by: Meriam | December 23, 2004 at 03:17 PM
This was a well-written piece, Wulfgar, and the comments here are all excellent. I would only add, through my personal experience, that these people can go quite mad with rage, sparking violence -- against any who are "agin" them, harking back to that old (unevolved) tribal mentality that "yer either with us or agin us." That not only includes people who are different from them in their color, religion or lifestyle, but anyone who does not agree with their warped mind-bending manifestos.
Their explosions are like simultaneous combustions, taking out all enemies who happen to be standing innocently near.
It's wise to be very aware of all their activities. However, whatever you have to do to be aware.
Posted by: Kate S. | December 25, 2004 at 12:02 PM
But Wulgar what the hell do we do?? We cant just ignore them. Can we??
Posted by: twilightsol | December 26, 2004 at 11:52 PM
We must always remember, they have a right to spew their self-righteous nonsense... WE have the right to not even listen to them. They DON'T have any special rights, they don't have the right to annoy everyone else, they don't have the right to hurt anyone else. They just have a right to believe what they believe, and to spout out their annoying little lies. Freedom for all. Of course... We do have a right to defend ourselves if attacked.
Posted by: Mark Wilson | December 29, 2004 at 10:22 PM
You sound almost as if you know something about what you are talking about, but unfortunately, most of your blog is typical liberal rhetoric. If you want to get rid of poison, you flush it down the toilet, you don't stock it in the medicine cabinet and distribute it to your friends hoping it will go away.
The National Alliance is a sick, evil, dangerous group. These morons understand very little, but like most animals they instinctively know when and where they are not wanted. There was an excellent article written in the BDC by the critics in Cour de La, Idaho who after many years, eventually ousted the National Alliance.
Your suggestion that letting them post notices will bankrupt their effort is false. Your 2-reasons for possibly signing his petition [supporting democracy and exposing him for defeat] also miss the mark. The fact is that criminals do not have the same rights & privileges as law abiding citizens. Criminals, when caught and prosecuted are generally incarcerated, and stripped of many of the freedoms that law abiding citizens enjoy.
You know the ACLU has been arguing for years that freedom means freedom for the Nazis or KKK to march down your street.... but what about the freedom to be free of their sickness?
There are limitations on freedom. Freedom carries with it a very high degree of moral responsibility. Laws in our society attempt to provide a benchmark by which our conduct is judged.
If your truly believe that principles of democracy support the idea that anyone should be permitted to run for office, then why not let bomb wielding terrorists board our aircraft? The difference is that in the latter case, you recognize the immediate threat of death & destruction that will result from the terrorist's suicide [homicide] bomb. And in the former case, you see it as some sort of liberal exercise in democracy to let enemies of the country, perpetrators of the greatest autrocities the world has witnessed -- to have the very same rights & privileges of law abiding, god fearing, Americans.
In my opinion, there is a fine line between freedom of speech and that which is no longer free because the message is one of hate, violence, anger or is completely and utterly against everything this great country stands for.
In my opinion, people who propogate genocide, white-supremacy and hate should be tried for treason.
Posted by: James | May 03, 2005 at 05:38 PM