He posted a comment on the story that basically said that the article was all "media bias" and that nothing can be said about burns until Burns's office is contacted by the FBI. This is ludicrus because the FBI can't legally comment on an ongoing investigation and Burns's camp certainly won't admit any investigation because it would directly contradict what he has been saying the last couple of weeks about not being under investigation. Once again, it is Eric's wishful thinking...
I have read Moorcats post, and I have decided that his conclusions are wrong.
Posted by: Eric Coobs | April 07, 2006 at 05:27 PM
And yet you won't say why. That's typical of you, Eric.
Posted by: Wulfgar | April 07, 2006 at 05:31 PM
He posted a comment on the story that basically said that the article was all "media bias" and that nothing can be said about burns until Burns's office is contacted by the FBI. This is ludicrus because the FBI can't legally comment on an ongoing investigation and Burns's camp certainly won't admit any investigation because it would directly contradict what he has been saying the last couple of weeks about not being under investigation. Once again, it is Eric's wishful thinking...
Moorcat
Posted by: moorcat | April 07, 2006 at 11:57 PM